English   Русский  

Russia Legalizes Property Seizure of Relocated Citizens in Administrative Cases

Russia Legalizes Property Seizure of Relocated Citizens in Administrative Cases

On June 10, Russian President Vladimir Putin signed a law providing for the seizure of property belonging to citizens who have left the country. The list includes 12 possible grounds for violations that may result in the freezing of bank accounts and confiscation of assets. The document has been published on the official government portal.

Which Offenses Are Covered by the New Rules?

The amendments expand the application of the Code of Administrative Offences to violations committed outside Russia. The law covers a limited list of 12 articles of the Administrative Code. These include:

  • discrediting the armed forces;
  • abuse of freedom of mass media;
  • dissemination of false information;
  • failure to comply with regulations governing individuals designated as foreign agents;
  • propaganda or public display of Nazi symbols;
  • insulting the head of state or public officials;
  • calls for sanctions against Russia.

What Russians Abroad May Face

For offenses committed outside Russia, administrative detention and compulsory community service will not be imposed. However, fines may still be issued, and authorities will be able to secure their enforcement through the seizure of property.

Funds held in citizens’ bank accounts and deposits will be targeted first. If these are insufficient or unavailable, other assets may be seized. Previously, such enforcement measures were used primarily against legal entities. The new law extends them to individuals, including cases involving failure to pay administrative fines within the prescribed period.

The assets of Russians living abroad may be frozen as early as the protocol-drafting stage. When property or documents are seized, the personal signature of the accused will no longer be required. Instead, officials may simply note that the individual is located outside Russia.

Individuals subject to proceedings under the new rules will be provided with a state-appointed defense lawyer. However, the costs of legal representation may be charged to the person facing administrative liability.

Positions of Authorities and Legal Experts

The Federation Council approved the law in early June after it had passed the State Duma. During the first reading, State Duma Speaker Vyacheslav Volodin said the amendments were aimed at citizens who had left Russia but continued, in his words, to “harm” the country while still owning property and receiving income from Russian sources.

Lawyers commenting on the initiative have highlighted potential risks associated with the new provisions. These include the possibility of disproportionate property seizures and difficulties in ensuring the right to defense for citizens residing abroad. At the same time, some experts argue that the use of property seizure as a mechanism to secure the payment of fines does not contradict the Constitution and is a common legal tool for enforcing decisions. The law will enter into force on September 1.

Conclusion

Analysts at International Investment note that the expansion of enforcement mechanisms and property seizure powers increases legal risks for citizens who retain assets in Russia after relocating abroad. For investors, this means greater uncertainty regarding property protection, particularly in cases where owners no longer reside in the country and may become subject to administrative proceedings conducted in absentia.

More attention is likely to be paid to ownership structures and the legal protection of assets. As the use of enforcement measures expands, the transparency of ownership arrangements and compliance with administrative regulations become increasingly important, since even financial penalties may ultimately result in the freezing of accounts or the seizure of property.

More broadly, these changes may encourage investors to adopt a more cautious approach when assessing risks associated with Russian assets and could influence decisions on whether to retain, restructure, or reallocate capital.